nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2022, 04, v.43 23-29
后官湖浮游生物群落结构特征及其环境驱动因子
基金项目(Foundation): 111计划项目(D20007); 国家现代农业产业技术体系资助(CARS-45); 岭南现代农业项目实验室(NT2021008); 湖南省重点研发计划项目(2020NK2016)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15928/j.1674-3075.202102210044
摘要:

为了解武汉后官湖国家湿地公园水生态环境现状,于2020年1-12月对后官湖的水质、浮游植物和浮游动物进行了监测,并基于综合营养状态指数、生物多样性指数对后官湖水环境进行了评价,使用Spearman相关分析以及冗余分析(RDA)探究环境因子对浮游植物群落的影响。结果表明,后官湖西部湖区的总磷和高锰酸盐指数最高,年均浓度分别达到了0.11 mg/L和5.37 mg/L,是后官湖的主要污染来源。综合营养状态指数为29.15~46.97,属于中营养状态;浮游植物Shannon-Weaver指数和Pielou指数分别为1.12~1.89、0.38~0.72,显示后官湖总体上为轻度污染到中度污染状态。调查期间共检出浮游植物7门、54属,其中1月和4月主要以绿藻门和隐藻门占优势,5-12月则以蓝藻门占优势。5月、9-10月桡足类在浮游动物群落中占优势,其他月份则是轮虫类占优势。相比于2017-2019年,2020年后官湖的营养状态水平和浮游植物丰度出现了明显下降,大型浮游动物在群落中的比例则明显上升。Spearman相关分析和冗余分析表明,影响后官湖浮游植物群落的主要环境因子为水温、透明度和浮游动物丰度。后官湖环境管理的不断加强和新冠疫情导致的流域内人类活动减弱,可能是2020年后官湖水生态环境质量明显提升的原因。

Abstract:

In this study, monthly data were collected on water quality, phytoplankton and zooplankton in the National Wetland Park of Houguan Lake from January to December 2020. Then, the current aquatic environmental condition of Houguan Lake was evaluated based on the data collected using the comprehensive trophic level index TLI(∑) and biodiversity indices.The influences of environmental factors on the phytoplankton community were analyzed by Spearman's correlation analysis and redundancy analysis(RDA). The aim was to provide data and scientific evidence to support ecological evaluation of Houguan Lake and shallow lake conservation. Houguan Lake consists of four sub-lakes(HG1: Gaohu Lake; HG2:Bailian Lake; HG3: Zhiyin Lake;HG4: Tian'e Lake) and an outflow river(HG5: Dagudu River). Water samples were collected in each section and the outflow river for determination of water quality parameters,phytoplankton and zooplankton each month except February and March(due to the COVID-19 pandemic).The concentration of total phosphorus and CODMn, were highest in the western lake(HG1), with respective average annual values of 0.11 mg/L and 5.37 mg/L. The comprehensive trophic level index of Houguan Lake ranged from 29.15 to 46.97, indicating a mesotrophic condition. The ranges of the Shannon-Weaver diversity and Pielou evenness indices of the phytoplankton community were, respectively, 1.12-1.89 and0.38-0.72, indicating light to medium pollution. A total of 54 phytoplankton genera from 7 families were identified during the investigation, dominated by Chlorophyta and Cryptophyta in January and April, and Cyanophyta from May to December. Copepods dominated the zooplankton community in May, September,and October, while rotifers dominated the community in other months. Compared with data from 2017 to2019, the trophic level and phytoplankton abundance of Houguan Lake significantly decreased in 2020,while the proportion of macrozooplankton in the zooplankton community significantly increased. Spearman correlation analysis and redundancy analysis showed that the main driving factors affecting the phytoplankton community of Houguan Lake were water temperature, transparency, and zooplankton abundance. Strengthening of environmental management and reduced human activity in the catchment due to COVID-19 could explain the environmental quality improvement in Houguan Lake in 2020.

参考文献

陈红,刘清,潘建雄,等,2019.灞河城市段浮游生物群落结构时空变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学报,39(1):173-184.

陈伟民,2005.湖泊生态系统观测方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.

冯佳,郭宇宁,王飞,等,2016.太原汾河景区浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子关系分析[J].环境科学,37(4):1353-1361.

国家环境保护总局,2002.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社.

胡鸿钧,魏印心,2006.中国淡水藻类--系统、分类及生态[M].北京:科学出版社.

卡尔夫,2011.湖沼学:内陆水生态系统[M].古滨河,刘正文,李宽意,等译.北京:高等教育出版社.

刘林峰,周先华,高健,等,2018.神农架大九湖湿地浮游植物群落结构特征及营养状态评价[J].湖泊科学,30(2):417-430.

彭凯,李太民,刘利,等,2018.苏北骆马湖浮游植物群落结构及其水质生物评价[J].湖泊科学,30(1):183-191.

秦伯强,许海,董百丽,2011.富营养化湖泊治理的理论与实践[M].北京:高等教育出版社.

孙文秀,武道吉,裴海燕,等,2019.山东某新建水库浮游藻类的群落结构特征及其环境驱动因子[J].湖泊科学,31(3):734-745.

孙沿,蔡芸,王亚飞,2018.武汉市后官湖浮游植物群落特征分析[J].中国资源综合利用,36(7):5-7.

汪梦琪,汪金成,王琪,等,2018.洞庭湖区平水期浮游生物群落结构特征及富营养化现状[J].生态学杂志,37(8):2418-2429.

熊莲,刘冬燕,王俊莉,等,2016.安徽太平湖浮游植物群落结构[J].湖泊科学,28(5):1066-1077.

杨水化,彭正洪,焦洪赞,等,2020.城市富营养化湖泊的外源污染负荷与贡献解析--以武汉市后官湖为例[J].湖泊科学,32(4):941-951.

张佳敏,高健,杨诚,等,2020.以鲢、鳙养殖为主的长江中下游武山湖浮游植物群落结构特征[J].湖泊科学,32(6):1771-1783.

张玮,赵风斌,徐后涛,等,2017.松雅湖成湖初期夏季浮游植物群落及其与环境因子的关系[J].生物学杂志,34(3):47-52.

张晓晶,李畅游,贾克力,等,2009.乌梁素海水体透明度分布及影响因子相关分析[J].湖泊科学,21(6):879-884.

章宗涉,黄祥飞,1991.淡水浮游生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社.

中华人民共和国环境保护部,2011.关于印发《地表水环境质量评价办法(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201104/t20110401_208364.htm.

Carvalho L,Mc Donald C,De Hoyos C,et al,2013.Sustaining recreational quality of European lakes:Minimizing the health risks from algal blooms through phosphorus control[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,50(2):315-323.

Jochimsen M C,Kümmerlin R,Straile D,2013.Compensatory dynamics and the stability of phytoplankton biomass during four decades of eutrophication and oligotrophication[J].Ecology Letters,16(1):81-89.

Liu Z W,Zhong P,Zhang X,et al,2014.Successful restoration of a tropical shallow eutrophic lake:strong bottom-up but weak top-down effects recorded[J].Water Research,146:88-97.

Paerl H W,Huisman J,2008.Blooms Like It Hot[J].Science,320:57-58.

Rao K,Zhang X,Yi X J,et al,2018.Interactive effects of environmental factors on phytoplankton communities and benthic nutrient interactions in a shallow lake and adjoining rivers in China[J].Science of The Total Environment,619/620:1661-1672.

Reynolds C S,2006.The ecology of phytoplankton[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Yang J R,Lv H,Isabwe A,et al,2017.Disturbance-induced phytoplankton regime shifts and recovery of cyanobacteria dominance in two subtropical reservoirs[J].Water Research,120:52-63.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15928/j.1674-3075.202102210044

中图分类号:Q178

引用信息:

[1]饶科,郭雯淇,汪平.后官湖浮游生物群落结构特征及其环境驱动因子[J].水生态学杂志,2022,43(04):23-29.DOI:10.15928/j.1674-3075.202102210044.

基金信息:

111计划项目(D20007); 国家现代农业产业技术体系资助(CARS-45); 岭南现代农业项目实验室(NT2021008); 湖南省重点研发计划项目(2020NK2016)

发布时间:

2022-07-15

出版时间:

2022-07-15

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文